49 Babies die in Drug trials in India!
Forty-nine babies have died in drug tests at one of India’s top hospitals, raising concerns that ethical standards are being compromised as the country becomes the world’s leading destination for clinical trials.
The deaths occurred over a period of 30 months at the Delhi-based All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), an elite medical college and public hospital renowned for providing low-cost treatment to the poor.
The victims were among the 4,142 infants who were used in a total of 42 clinical trials — one of the final stages of developing a new drug — at AIIMS since January 2006, many for Western companies. Of the children used in the trials, 2,728 were aged under a year old.
The mortality rate among the babies, many of whom were seriously ill before they became part of the clinical trials, was 1.2 per cent — significantly below the 4 per cent for all patients treated at the hospital.
Manish Tiwari, a spokesperson for the Congress party, which heads India’s coalition Government, said: “The practice of using infants like guinea-pigs for drug testing must end.”
Campaign groups have voiced concerns that the poor, often illiterate, parents who make use of the publicly subsidised healthcare that is available at institutions such as AIIMS do not understand the implications of putting forward children to test new drugs.
Rahul Verma, of the Uday Foundation for Congenital Defects and Rare Blood Groups, which exposed the AIIMS deaths after a request under freedom of information laws, said: “If you are rich in this country you go to a private doctor. You certainly don’t put your child up to be experimented on.”
India has become the leading destination for international pharmaceutical companies to outsource clinical trials, largely because of the diverse genetic pool offered by its population and the low cost of doing business.
Clinical trials on human beings are forecast to become a £1 billion-a-year industry in India by 2010. According to the Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance, GlaxoSmithKline, the London-listed pharmaceutical giant, and Johnson & Johnson, its US-based peer, are the two leading groups engaged in testing new drugs in India, each conducting 22 trials over the past year.
The country’s regulatory infrastructure has been found to be weak and the office of the Drugs Controller, which has to approve drugs trials, including those at AIIMS, is understaffed.
A spokesman for AIIMS, which has a strong international reputation, said that it was important to note that it was not yet known how many of the deaths occurred among babies given drugs and how many among those in control groups, who received placebos. “Many of these babies were very ill,” he said.
It is understood that an inquiry into the deaths ordered by Anbumani Ramadoss, the Indian Health Minister, will focus on two trials carried out at AIIMS funded by the World Health Organisation and the Indian Government. It is not known what treatments were being tested.
Experts said that the entry of large Western drugs developers into India has raised safety and ethics standards but admit that India’s regulatory systems are failing to keep pace with a boom in clinical trials.
Rashma Cama, of the Indian Institute of Clinical Research, said: “Informed consent is now the norm and regulations have become stricter but there is a need for savvier investigators.”
Trial and error
£500m Average cost of bringing a new drug to market. Human clinical trials are the most expensive phase of drug development
60 Percentage by which costs can be cut by holding trials in India
400 The approximate number of trials under way in the country
£1bn Predicted value of the industry to India by 2010
Source: Times archive
that'll be cos the docs have bogus qualifications...and the nurses' qualifications are questionable too,it'll be a bloody free for all.....
The CIA World Factbook gives the 2008 infant mortality rate as 3.2% for India. Given that these babies wil have been sick before being admitted: keep the trials going, good work guys!
The stats seem to say it all, 1.2% died under trial conditions vs. 4% overall mortality in that hospital. Surely that's a figure to be praised, not condemned.
I agree, I'm sure there are all sorts of ethical issues involved, but it appears that the babies are actually advantaged by being involved in the clinical trials.
Much of the 60% apparently saved by holding such trials in India will be due to reduced labour costs alone, surely.
Perhaps another way of looking at it: what treatment would have been otherwise available to those babies if the trials and their sponsors weren't happening at the local hospital?
I'm sure there are worse things happening in India......
Don't tell me you are suprised by what's going on in India!!!
just eat another pie
Hmmmmm.....I'm not against human testing per say, as eventually all drugs must be tested on humans...however I don't believe babies should be used as they can hardly consent and obviously there parents are too uneducated to know what they're doing.
Visit www.qatarhappening.com
.