Libya...NATO...and new agreements
Lately , Gaddafi asked a help from African union, i start and "this is my personal opinion" i start to feel the wind of changing in the position of NATO.
Gaddafi and after all this attacks , he is ready to sell his oil of part of it free to NATO and do some Concessions.
DO you think NATO will leave the revolutionizers alone in the battle of conflict and let them have their own " FREEDOM"??
and do you think we will hear in the news networks like BBC arabia, jazeera, FOX...etc we will hear them saying Libian military instead of Gaddafi troops, and riots instead of revolutionizers.
Translation of the above Arabic comment
All of y'all are mad,don't u have anything better to do .get back to work yalla.
On a Friday ?
:D
i don't want to say it but :
" i told you so ;) "
One of the few things that cheer me up in this dreary world is Politics and the untruths of our leaders..
Today US, British and French leaders insisted that Gaddafi must step down in Libya... :o)
as a continuation to this topic
please read the new updates :
US refuses to return to frontline in Libya
BERLIN (AFP) – The United States resisted pressure Thursday to return its warplanes to the frontline in Libya even as NATO vowed to keep bombing Moamer Kadhafi's forces and pressed the strongman to quit.
As NATO foreign ministers meeting in Berlin struggled to heal a rift over the mission, rebels said Kadhafi forces shelled the city of Misrata, killing 13 people, while blasts rocked Tripoli as jets screamed over the capital.
The ministers issued a joint statement calling on Kadhafi to leave power, and they vowed to maintain "a high operational tempo" against regime targets and "exert this pressure as long as necessary."
Despite the show of unity, the allies remained divided over French and British calls to contribute more jets to the mission. Nearly a month of coalition strikes have failed to shift the balance of power so far.
French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe made a personal appeal to US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for Washington to resume major air raids in Libya, but he said his plea was rebuffed.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110414/pl_afp/libyaconflictnato
Hi love - hope you are ok. x
I agree with you - he is struggling and he will be ousted very soon.
Three things for me:
(1) He will be taken out by his own
(2) By default he will be taken out by the rebels
(3) Libya will end up like Cyprus and he won't like that idea; so he disappears :-)
He will go. This is for sure - he is being judged by the people he thought liked him.
I hope and pray that this works for the Libyan people.
Now his son is saying that the idea of his father to leave the presidency is "SILLY".
lol...i think his ending is very near :P
The ceasefire has to accepted by both sides. I accept that Gaddafi is untrustworthy, but so are the other side.
The final decision surely will rest with the "external" forces..
english in the main forum please :P
'South African President Jacob Zuma, head of an AU peace mission, said early today that Gaddafi had accepted a peace "road map", including a ceasefire, after talks in Tripoli.'
then......
'Forces loyal to Muammar Gaddafi shelled the besieged town of Misrata today after the African Union said he had accepted a plan to end Libya's civil war.'
'"It does not appear that this indication of a peace deal has any substance at this point," said one Nato official in reference to the shelling of Misrata.
The African Union does not have a good track record in brokering peace deals, having failed recently to end conflict or disputes in Somalia, Madagascar and Ivory Coast.'
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/gaddafi-forces-shell-town-after-he-accepts-peace-plan-2266294.html
He might just pull this one off.
كلكم مجنون ما في عندكم شغول حرك شغولكم
whatever said and done ... this is all a deception.
The tone has been set. NATO's objectives are clear.
the African union is trying to mediate and come to a solution acceptable to ALL parties.
I can't see Gaddafi lasting too long ..