Seeing as you have a signature yourself Segmund, I'm sure you are aware of what signatures are. MY signature (as seen at the bottom of ALL of my posts) is: This post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects.
And my signature actually refers to MY posts, hence the 'This post" And was in no way directed at you, and I'm not entirely sure why you thought it was, or why it deserved such a lengthy response.
As to your "justification" for your reasoning, in your initial post you asked in the punishment was deserved, to which everyone has answered you in the affirmative that it was. When the punishment was given, the courts were under the impression that the wife had miscarried, therefore the 1 year was justifiable. That it turned out later that the pregnancy was still viable and he was released is a moot point. At the time the sentence was given, the punishment was justified.
Seeing as you have a signature yourself Segmund, I'm sure you are aware of what signatures are. MY signature (as seen at the bottom of ALL of my posts) is: This post is a natural product. The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects.
And my signature actually refers to MY posts, hence the 'This post" And was in no way directed at you, and I'm not entirely sure why you thought it was, or why it deserved such a lengthy response.
As to your "justification" for your reasoning, in your initial post you asked in the punishment was deserved, to which everyone has answered you in the affirmative that it was. When the punishment was given, the courts were under the impression that the wife had miscarried, therefore the 1 year was justifiable. That it turned out later that the pregnancy was still viable and he was released is a moot point. At the time the sentence was given, the punishment was justified.