I'm afraid you are wrong. Qatari made the right choice in removing the names from the article. I enjoy reading Qatar Living, and if it's going to survive then the admins have to make responsible choices.
The allegations are serious, and have the ring of truth about them. But with only one source, Qatari is left with a potentially libellous story sat on his site. I would have made the same decision, no matter how much I believed the awful story.
For people who criticise the nationality/religion being left in the article: nations and religions can't sue, but individuals can.
I'm afraid you are wrong. Qatari made the right choice in removing the names from the article. I enjoy reading Qatar Living, and if it's going to survive then the admins have to make responsible choices.
The allegations are serious, and have the ring of truth about them. But with only one source, Qatari is left with a potentially libellous story sat on his site. I would have made the same decision, no matter how much I believed the awful story.
For people who criticise the nationality/religion being left in the article: nations and religions can't sue, but individuals can.
--nigel
http://qatarjournal.com/~ngourlay/journal/