I enjoy reading your points although I don´t particularly agree.
You see, you are speaking from an islamic point of view, and yes, the Quran gives some "instructions" and shows an ideal state (can´t remeber how muslims name this ideal form of society!!!) in which there is only armony, justice and equility.
The problem is that the Quran gives vague instructions as to how to achieve this ideal and, more importantly, how to mantain it pure once it has been achieved thruough the changes of time.
To my opinion, this is an unachievable ideal. An utopia. Something imposible.
When I say that justice shouldn´t be timeless or it should apply differently to different cultures, I am just being realistic. For example, whilst Sharia can be perfectly just in some regions, it wouldn´t be applicable to other parts of the world. Roman law wouldn´t be applicable to today´s time in history and so on. That´s what I meant by saying that justice should be volatile.
I enjoy reading your points although I don´t particularly agree.
You see, you are speaking from an islamic point of view, and yes, the Quran gives some "instructions" and shows an ideal state (can´t remeber how muslims name this ideal form of society!!!) in which there is only armony, justice and equility.
The problem is that the Quran gives vague instructions as to how to achieve this ideal and, more importantly, how to mantain it pure once it has been achieved thruough the changes of time.
To my opinion, this is an unachievable ideal. An utopia. Something imposible.
When I say that justice shouldn´t be timeless or it should apply differently to different cultures, I am just being realistic. For example, whilst Sharia can be perfectly just in some regions, it wouldn´t be applicable to other parts of the world. Roman law wouldn´t be applicable to today´s time in history and so on. That´s what I meant by saying that justice should be volatile.