Marjorie... on what basis do you define homosexuality as "natural"? I have given you my reasoning why i think it is "unnatural" (see previous posts).
I am not using the "immoral" argument at all, thats neither here nor there, from a biological perspective, homosexuality is neither natural or healthy. These are undeniable facts. Just as smoking cigarettes is neither natural or healthy. These are choices that people make because they want to.
I think that if two consenting men want to insert things into each other in the privacy of their own homes, thats their business. However, to promote this behaviour as "natural" and DEMAND special treatment is unacceptable.
Marjorie... on what basis do you define homosexuality as "natural"? I have given you my reasoning why i think it is "unnatural" (see previous posts).
I am not using the "immoral" argument at all, thats neither here nor there, from a biological perspective, homosexuality is neither natural or healthy. These are undeniable facts. Just as smoking cigarettes is neither natural or healthy. These are choices that people make because they want to.
I think that if two consenting men want to insert things into each other in the privacy of their own homes, thats their business. However, to promote this behaviour as "natural" and DEMAND special treatment is unacceptable.
Respect
GIASI