Mobile phones 'more dangerous than smoking'
>Mobile phones could kill far more people than smoking or asbestos, a study by an award-winning cancer expert has concluded. He says people should avoid using them wherever possible and that governments and the mobile phone industry must take "immediate steps" to reduce exposure to their radiation.
>Mobile phone danger to unborn child: Use could cause behavioural problems
>Chances are you've already made at least one call on your mobile today - just like 40 million other users in the UK.
Mobile usage is immense, with half the world's population predicted to have one by the end of the decade.
But if new research is to be believed, we could be sitting on a health time-bomb.
Ever since these nifty gadgets first became popular they've been plagued with health concerns.
Yet time after time we've been reassured by the government and mobile phone companies that they pose no danger - until now.
The most comprehensive study of the risks so far has found that regular use of a mobile phone for more than a decade can raise your risk of cancer.
Two Swedish scientists, Professor Lennart Hardell and Professor Kjell Hansson Mild, found that longterm users had double the chance of developing a tumour on the side of the brain they held the handset. And, more frighteningly, just one hour a day on the mobile was enough to increase the risk.
Playing down the dangers
Only last month, Britain's largest investigation into the health risks of phones, the £8.8m Mobile Telecommunications and Health Research (MTHR) programme - funded by the government and phone companies - reported that "mobile phones have not been found to be associated with any adverse health effects".
But other scientists argue that this, and previous official reassurances, have been based on studies that have included few long-term users - simply because mobiles haven't been around long enough.
The MTHR chairman even admitted: "We cannot rule out the possibility at this stage that cancer could appear in a few years' time."
What's being done to prevent the risk?
The Swedish scientists behind the latest study want a change to be made to the current radiation emission safety levels for mobiles and other sources of radiation, which they describe as "inappropriate" and "not safe".
The international standard is designed to prevent dangerous heat levels and electrical currents but they say it doesn't take into account the risk of triggering cancer, they say.
"The truth is, we don't yet know exactly what the effects of radiation emitted from mobiles and mobile masts are," says environmental scientist Dr Matt Salzmann.
"Cancers take at least 10 years - and normally much longer - to develop but, as mobile phones have become widespread so recently and rapidly, few people have been using them that long."
Experts fear we could see many more long-term mobile users developing brain tumours after 15, 20 or 30 years, and they're particularly concerned about the potential effects on young people.
Are my kids at risk?
A shocking one in three children aged from seven to 11 now owns a mobile. Yet experts fear children could be at greatest risk from radiation damage because their thinner skulls and developing nervous systems could make them more susceptible.
"Children shouldn't use mobile phones unless it's absolutely necessary," according to Professor Hansson Mild.
A recent BBC Panorama programme also highlighted concern over the use of Wi-Fi - wireless Internet - systems in schools. One report suggested they could give off three times as much radiation as a mobile phone mast.
Philip Parkin, general secretary of the Professional Association of Teachers, has called for the suspension of this technology in schools until more research is done.
"I have heard and read enough to make me concerned," he says. "Until there is a proper inquiry, the nation's children are being treated as guinea pigs in a large-scale experiment."
But Dr Salzmann is worried about a knee-jerk reaction: "The bottom line is we just don't know at the moment.
"More research is needed before we either pronounce mobile technology safe or start panicking and banning it on the basis of bad science.
"In the meantime, it's wise to be cautious and limit your mobile usage."
Even the mobile phones with the extended filters to reduce tar & nicotine??
_______________________________________________________
"A Wise Man knows what he does not know!"
sahlim79, wow, you linked to a "Made for AdSense" website, they automatically copy from RSS feeds to look like a blog, and use Google Adsense to generate revenue. They are not a real site.
http://health.taragana.net/articles/neurosurgeon-warns-mobile-phone-more-dangerous-than-smoking/
.Mobile phones 'more dangerous than smoking'.
.i think it depends on the brand of your mobile...
.lol
.
.just kiddin......
.
.
.
.that's all......
.
I don't believe these sources:
anti-emf is a company selling products to protect against this imaginary risk.
The daily mail is a tabloid.
textually is a blog that links to ANYTHING related to mobiles.
This looks like a scientist looking for media attention, paid by a company that sells products, and quoted by media sources wanting to fill pages (both online and offline)
crap...........
Aana free, jaana free,
Pakde gaye tho khana free.
http://www.anti-emf.com/Chi-Wave-Guard.htm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-567125/Mobile-phone-danger-unborn-child-Use-cause-behavioural-problems.html
www.textually.org/.../2008/05/020151.htm
source pls...