MD, I did not say that the aponsorship law was for banks, I said it was for the protection of the person liable IF someone steps out on their debts. I mentioned the whole lending system being flawed which results in the sponsorship law.
Everyone is more than welcome to come and go as they please, but with the banks lending massive amounts of money to non-citizens (banks make their money any way they can) and in turn sponsors being left with debts would it not make more sense to control lending to non-citizens to help alleviate the sponsorship problem?
As was posted in another thread, slavery is a plight in where you have no choice. We have choices in this instance MD.
____________________________________________________
"Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock - Will Rogers"
MD, I did not say that the aponsorship law was for banks, I said it was for the protection of the person liable IF someone steps out on their debts. I mentioned the whole lending system being flawed which results in the sponsorship law.
Everyone is more than welcome to come and go as they please, but with the banks lending massive amounts of money to non-citizens (banks make their money any way they can) and in turn sponsors being left with debts would it not make more sense to control lending to non-citizens to help alleviate the sponsorship problem?
As was posted in another thread, slavery is a plight in where you have no choice. We have choices in this instance MD.
____________________________________________________
"Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock - Will Rogers"